understanding Notes From Underground by Dostoyevsky

By lampseal1983

Hey everyone. I just wrapped this up today, and it’s my third Dostoyevsky book—my order was C&P, Demons, (Notes), The Idiot, and now TBK. I’m not totally sure I “got” all the philosophy stuff, though. The first chunk (like the first 20 pages) really seems to push free will over rational thinking. There’s that whole idea about a world where everything is basically pre-set, but people still end up doing awful stuff just so they can prove they’re choosing for themselves—like they’re not just automatons. I know I don’t fully understand existentialism, but from what I’ve picked up, it kind of messes with strict logic and insists people have to make their own meaning instead of waiting for some neat explanation. (I might be mixing it up with logotherapy here, so feel free to correct me.) What I’m stuck on is how the main guy actually fits that. Early on he talks like he’s really on board with the whole thing, but then he kind of stalls out. He seems to reject a logical view of the world, but then he ends up overthinking everything, getting overwhelmed and kind of spiteful. That makes me wonder if the book is showing what happens when someone can’t figure out their place and just hides behind their own intellect. Like, it’s kind of a warning against intellectual arrogance. This might be a dumb question, but is he basically an anti-example of existentialist philosophy? Any clarification would be awesome. I’ve been swamped with college lately, so I didn’t sink into this one as hard as I did with Demons. Also shout out to all my fellow Mech E majors.